Mackerel (cooked) vs Salmon (cooked)
| Mackerel (cooked) | Salmon (cooked) | |
|---|---|---|
| Protein · per 100 g | 23.9 g | 22.1 g |
| Carbs · per 100 g | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| Fat · per 100 g | 17.8 g | 12.3 g |
| Fiber · per 100 g | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| Energy · per 100 g | 262.0 kcal | 206.0 kcal |
| Protein · per 100 kcal | 9.1 g | 10.7 g |
| To hit 30 g protein | 126 g · 330 kcal | 136 g · 280 kcal |
The same three numbers, drawn
What 30 g of protein looks like on a plate
Where the calories come from
The one-line verdict: Salmon (cooked) delivers 1.2× the protein per calorie of Mackerel (cooked) (10.7 g vs 9.1 g per 100 kcal).
More protein / 100 g: MackerelLighter per 100 g: SalmonSmaller 30 g portion: Mackerel
Swap in your own pair
Bold marks the better side of each row. "Per 100 kcal" answers the density question — which food delivers more protein for the energy it costs. Portion row is computed live from the same USDA base values shown on each food page.