Sorghum (cooked) vs Millet (cooked)
Both count toward 30 plants a week.
| Sorghum (cooked) | Millet (cooked) | |
|---|---|---|
| Protein · per 100 g | 10.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Carbs · per 100 g | 72.1 g | 23.7 g |
| Fat · per 100 g | 3.5 g | 1.0 g |
| Fiber · per 100 g | 6.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Energy · per 100 g | 329.0 kcal | 119.0 kcal |
| Protein · per 100 kcal | 3.2 g | 2.9 g |
| To hit 30 g protein | 282 g · 929 kcal | 855 g · 1017 kcal |
The same three numbers, drawn
What 30 g of protein looks like on a plate
Where the calories come from
The one-line verdict: Sorghum (cooked) delivers 1.1× the protein per calorie of Millet (cooked) (3.2 g vs 2.9 g per 100 kcal).
More protein / 100 g: SorghumMore fiber / 100 g: SorghumLighter per 100 g: MilletSmaller 30 g portion: Sorghum
Swap in your own pair
Bold marks the better side of each row. "Per 100 kcal" answers the density question — which food delivers more protein for the energy it costs. Portion row is computed live from the same USDA base values shown on each food page.